On a sidenote, having insecurity problems suck.
That's the understatement of the century. Sometimes I can't help wondering if the world is better off without humans.
Let's imagine the world is a math equation.
Some disrepancy occurs and Humans multiply. The balance is altered. Then the humans divide the resources (unequally, with rich, unscrupulous countries taking a bigger share and other timid continets e.g. Africa taking a smaller share) and start using them. Some species of plants or animals evolve and humans grow food, thus increasing the amount of useful living things. Others are subtracted from The Great Equation as we deem them useless. The world is now a huge balance, and it is tilted one way, to the point where you can imagine it slowly but surely sliding off its axis. The number of humans, like mutations, eventually outnumber the number of useful products and end up using each other for survival. In the end, we kill each other and the world dies.
That's my imagined scenario, with obvious inclusion of cannibalism. Why not? It can happen, at the rate we're doing deforestation and hunting and our selfish need to survive.
My arms are too tired to type. Shall return to this tomorrow.
